Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From avi@xxxxxxx 2006-06-02 08:31 EST ------- Version 0.6.2 is available at: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=117521&package_id=127957 (In reply to comment #31) > ln -sf ../../%{_lib}/libelektra.so.? $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libelektra.so Doesn't work. Globs don't work inside specs. > Wha do you mean by "They are sort of fake"? I had a look at the code, and > indeed in keyset.c usleep is used although there is no > #include <unistd.h> > (maybe conditionalized on HAVE_UNISTD_H, with AC_CHECK_HEADERS(unistd.h)) This is happening already. This bug is being fixed by our build system specialists. > As a side note, in case you weren't aware, in the usleep man page, > there is: > This function is obsolete. Use nanosleep(2) or setitimer(2) instead. Will be changed post-0.6.2, just released. > who accepts the dlopened libs in /lib Patrice Dumas accepted patch moved dlopened backends to /lib/elektra/ (In reply to comment #32) > As it ships a .pc file, the elektra-devel package should > Requires: pkgconfig Dependency added. How and where to ask for a sponsor ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review