[Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elektra


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430





------- Additional Comments From avi@xxxxxxx  2006-06-02 08:31 EST -------
Version 0.6.2 is available at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=117521&package_id=127957

(In reply to comment #31)
> ln -sf ../../%{_lib}/libelektra.so.? 
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libelektra.so

Doesn't work. Globs don't work inside specs.


> Wha do you mean by "They are sort of fake"? I had a look at the code, and
> indeed in keyset.c usleep is used although there is no
> #include <unistd.h>
> (maybe conditionalized on HAVE_UNISTD_H, with AC_CHECK_HEADERS(unistd.h))

This is happening already. This bug is being fixed by our build system 
specialists.


> As a side note, in case you weren't aware, in the usleep man page, 
> there is:
>    This function is obsolete. Use nanosleep(2) or setitimer(2) instead.

Will be changed post-0.6.2, just released.


> who accepts the dlopened libs in /lib

Patrice Dumas accepted patch moved dlopened backends to /lib/elektra/


(In reply to comment #32)
> As it ships a .pc file, the elektra-devel package should 
> Requires:   pkgconfig

Dependency added.


How and where to ask for a sponsor ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]