Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-01 19:58 EST ------- The issue was simply a missing BuildRequires: libXt-devel; I'll add it and proceed with the review. Note that the ChangeLog file has zero length and should not be packaged: E: lineak-xosdplugin zero-length /usr/share/doc/lineak-xosdplugin-0.8.4/ChangeLog These are pretty quick fixes, so I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix them when you check in. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: 36f519b21e7c7257bd9af6543f7fd9fc lineak_xosdplugin-0.8.4.tar.gz 36f519b21e7c7257bd9af6543f7fd9fc lineak_xosdplugin-0.8.4.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (after adding libXt-devel as above). O package builds in mock (development, x86_64) (after fixing BRs.) X rpmlint complains about ChangeLog. * final provides and requires are sane: lineak_xosdplugin = 0.8.4 xosdplugin.so()(64bit) lineak-xosdplugin = 0.8.4-4.fc6 - libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) liblineak.so.0()(64bit) libxosd.so.2()(64bit) lineakd = 0.8.4 xosd >= 2.1 * one shared library is present, but it is internal to lineakd and so there's no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, but please don't package the zero length ChangeLog and don't forget to add the BR: libXt-devel so the package will build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review