Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189713 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-01 13:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Why call autogen.sh? thats concidered bad practice unless absolutly I am calling autogen.sh because the source is nightly tarball from CVS not containing a configure file. The latest available source I found is contained in a SRPM more than a year old (http://www.acepoint.de/GnuBG/redhat/gnubg-0.15-1.src.rpm). The nightly CVS tarballs seem to be the only recent published sources available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review