Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192603 j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-05-29 04:55 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: W: openalpp-devel no-documentation No problem here. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (LGPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-i386 * BR: ok * No locales * ldconfig properly called for shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * proper -devel package needed * .la files not packaged * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST fix: ========= * Group: for the base package is wrong it should be: "System Environment/Libraries" Should fix: =========== * Why patch 3330 ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review