Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-26 11:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > One would wager that rpm macros need to be updated for %makeinstall if it is not > 'modern' enough. Not sure that's good idea. Most packages will work with either approach, but some will depend on the way one or the other works, and will fail with the alternative approach. > The previous spec had: > > Requires: gnome-python2, pygtk2, pygtk2-libglade, gnome-python2-canvas > Requires: policycoreutils > Requires: rhpl >= 0.148.2 usermode > Requires: python >= 2.3 I wonder if it was a good idea to remove these since none of these deps (even the python(abi) = 2.4 dep that I'd expect) have been found automatically by rpm. > These have been removed, but the version wasn't updated, nor was made mention > that this change had happened. Hmm, not good. Please update the release tag whenever a change is made to the package, so it's easy to tell which comments refer to which version of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review