Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-25 00:25 EST ------- I did some work and found something useful: KDE does this to start the biof (for example) screensaver when you click the "Test" button: kxsrun biof -- --root (this comes from the biof.desktop file). strace'ing this gives (among a big pile of stuff): 8989 access("/usr/libexec/xscreensaver/biof", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) But it was installed in /usr/bin/biof. Symlinking it to where kxsrun wants to see it results in a working screensaver. So I guess it's reasonable to ask why these are in /usr/bin instead of /usr/libexec/xscreensaver. They aren't really useful when called directly, are they? I also noticed that xscreensaver-demo doesn't show any of the new hacks, even after I make the symlink. (I have the rss-glx-xscreensaver package installed.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review