Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-24 17:35 EST ------- - I would suggest http://www.turbogears.org/download/index.html as the URL. At least it gives reference to TurboGears. - md5sum matches 0bdec1022ad28a6819abc99e5f2e5b7c RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev-r2115.tar.gz 0bdec1022ad28a6819abc99e5f2e5b7c RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev-r2115.tar.gz.srpm - spec is clean and readable. Question: - What's the latest about packaging/ghosting .pyo files? Bad: - doesn't build on x86_64, needs: %{python_sitearch}/RuleDispatch-%{version}.dev_%{svnrev}-py%{pyver}.egg-info %{python_sitearch}/dispatch instead of sitelib. - rpmlint: W: python-ruledispatch invalid-license PSF or ZPL This matches the PKG-INFO file, though the source file don't say anything. W: python-ruledispatch invalid-url (none) - see above. E: python-ruledispatch zero-length /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2115-py2.4.egg-info/zip-safe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review