Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-05-23 03:59 EST ------- Chris and I had a private discussion about this by email because BZ was down, copy and pasting it here for future reference: --- Hi Chris, Bugzilla is down so I'm doing it this way. Thanks for the review. About the missing BR I failed to add that its needed for the devel branch too, things just worked on my system because I already had the needed devel-package installed. About the name, I wans't sure about this myself, so now I've changed the name to xgalaxy (googled, not taken already). New SRPM and spec are at: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ Regards, Hans --- Christopher Stone wrote: > okay ill take a look at this tomorrow, been really busy today and > didnt get the chance to look at it. > > Do you think the name is going to be a problem? I'd prefer xgalaga, > but then again, it's probably better to be safe than sorry. > The name is most likely not a problem, because the people with the rights to the original name probably don't care. xgalaga has existed under this name for a long time without trouble. Then again the name had both me and you worried and those are valid worries the name is a legal problem. Even if the other party _probably_ doesn't care it still is a legal issue. It is the _probably_ that scares me and untill the "upto now" part of upto now this hasn't been a problem. If the people with the rights to the name one day all of a sudden do start caring, or get a grudge against OSS we've a problem, which I would rather avoid. Since I've already done the hard work of renaming (and recreating the "logo") I think its best / safest to stick with the new name. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review