Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 fedora.wickert@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert@xxxxxxxx 2006-05-19 11:53 EST ------- $ md5sum serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm 5965ec6a4622440337452084f79c5c59 serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm REVIEW: - rpmlint clean: $ ls *.rpm serpentine-0.6.91-1.noarch.rpm serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm $ rpmlint *.rpm ; echo $? 0 - package and spec naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is GPL, matches license field spec - license both included in source and %doc - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds OK on FC5 (noarch) and in FC5 and rawhide mock (noarch) - BR's OK, on duplicates, no exeptions - locales handled correctly - no libraries to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership issues - no duplicates in %files - permissions OK, correct %defattr - %clean section present and correct - macro usage consistent - code, not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no pkgconfigs to worry about - no devel sub package needed - desktop file OK and properly installed - scriptlets match examples from wiki APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review