Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-19 08:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #280) > 4. the full explanation is somewhere on the initng mailinglist. somewhere in > the 2005 archives if i am not too wrong. After a whole lot of searching in the archive I give up. The only mails I find regarding the issue are the ones where I try to solve it :-/ Back in november I was trying to make a plugin for it. What I still can't figure out is why Fedora is having these troubles when other distro's just work right out of the box. Something with utf stuff set up in the kernel? (In reply to comment #281) > suspend / resume doesent work in fc5 with initng > should be looked into Do you file it upstreams? I have no idea if this work with other distros... > as for the chicken egg problem... not having initng depend on the ifiles would > make it build in mock. Yep. And it would also mean that a whole lot of people would just do a "yum install initng", reboot and then blame us when it doesn't work. Initng needs the ifiles to do any good. But do initng-devel really need initng? Or is it just common practice that foo-devel depends on foo? I noticed btw that initscripts depends on SysVinit but not the other way around. Seems strange to me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review