Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 jamatos@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dvipost - |Review Request: tetex- |latex post filter command |dvipost - latex post filter | |command ------- Additional Comments From jamatos@xxxxxxxx 2006-05-19 08:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Upstream should probably be bugged about that. If I was building it from source, > I would want it in TEXMFLOCAL (or in my home dir texmf) - so it should be a > configure switch (and probably should default to TEXMFLOCAL if no arguement is > given to configure) I agree with your analysis, Michael. This goes to my todo list with low priority though. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review