Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-19 01:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > images/adverts.rgb: SuSE, Slashdot, Philips, TuxRacer, SourceForge, VA Linux > > logos, I guess "plib" could be considered safe ;-) > Yes you're correct, good catch. That one needs replacing I'll whip up something > new using ok to use logo's like tux and erm tux? Sure ;-). Perhaps just some stylised generic pictures like e.g. a shampoo bottle, a house, ... could be used. > > > images/egypt.rgb: looks like scanned Egyptian drawings > > Dunno whats the source, but I dare sayt hat the copyright on these has expired, > even with the disney copyright extension in place. Well if they're originally Egyptian from ancient times, then yes. If they're something that someone just styled that way, probably not... Point is we can't know it so I'd better play safe. > > images/geeko_icon.rgb, images/players.rgb: resembles SUSE's geeko mascot, don't > > know whether this is trademarked > > Erm, it resembles a lizzard yes, afaik having images that resemble an animal > isn't illegal. Calling them "Geeko" maybe is (I don't know whether SUSE trademarked it and how their trademark rules are). > > images/lunchbox.rgb: something that looks like a Barbie doll; > Yes it looks like a dress up doll, there are many dress up dolls both with a > thin and a thick figure as long as it doesn't say "Barbie" on it or really is a > clear picture of one I think this is ok. I thiught "copyright" as well, it looks like a scan of such a doll's box and usualy that stuff is plastered with copyright notices (although I don't see any copyrightable value in them others might differ). > I dunno if upstream is alive, but I will replace them, should I make a new > source tarball or is it enough to just not put them in the RPM's (leaving them > in the SRPM) ? I don't know, perhaps someone else has an idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review