[Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049





------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-05-18 07:32 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> > I added buildrequires docbook2X for that.
> 
> This shouldn't be needed, as the files are allready up to date in the
> tarball. Doesn't hurt, though.

Ok, configure tests for it anyway.

> There is a bug in doc/C/Makefile.am regarding info files installation
> during staged install. I'll attach patches.

Oh, I didn't notice any error.

> > I also subpackaged the libraries.

> Anyway I think it is better to have
> the libraries together with the standalone player. But if you want to
> split, you can;

Well the libs are required by each of the other subpackages so I thought
it makes sense to separate them out: assuming many people would only
want one of the plugins.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]