Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-18 07:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > I added buildrequires docbook2X for that. > > This shouldn't be needed, as the files are allready up to date in the > tarball. Doesn't hurt, though. Ok, configure tests for it anyway. > There is a bug in doc/C/Makefile.am regarding info files installation > during staged install. I'll attach patches. Oh, I didn't notice any error. > > I also subpackaged the libraries. > Anyway I think it is better to have > the libraries together with the standalone player. But if you want to > split, you can; Well the libs are required by each of the other subpackages so I thought it makes sense to separate them out: assuming many people would only want one of the plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review