Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 ------- Additional Comments From ed@xxxxxxx 2006-05-16 10:25 EST ------- Hi Neal, this is still not a complete review but we have at this point covered a number of the review items. good: + builds in mock on FC5 i386 + dir ownership appears to be OK + permissions look OK needswork: - rpmlint returns 168 errors/warnings of which 167 are: 126 are devel-file-in-non-devel-package 39 are non-executable-script 2 are script-without-shellbang and these can probably be safely ignored. The one remaining warning is: W: scipy summary-ended-with-dot Scipy: array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. and you can easily fix it. questions: 1) There are a number of files in directories of the form %{python_sitearch}/scipy/*/tests/* and %{python_sitearch}/scipy/*/examples/* Perhaps they should go in sub-packages such as scipy-test and scipy-docs or similar? Whats your opinion of putting them in sub-packages? 2) What is your sponsorship status? Are any of the other packages you submitted closer to passing review? I'm just a little leery about sponsoring you since I'm not familiar with any of the other packages and just don't have enough free time to learn about them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review