Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-15 10:33 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream-1.22-2.fc5.src.rpm Additionally, with respect to licensing, the author indicates that perl (GPL & Artistic) is the correct license: Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:52:31 -0500 From: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question Yep. Chris Weyl wrote: > Hey Ryan-- > > Quick question. I'm in the middle of packaging up Net::XMPP (and for > that matter, XML::Stream and Net::Jabber) for fedora extras, and it > was pointed out to me that while Net/XMPP.pm states "COPYRIGHT: This > module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it > under the same terms as Perl itself", the actual archive includes a > LICENSE.LGPL. > > Are all three of these modules under "the same terms as Perl itself"? > > Thanks:) > -Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review