Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-15 08:22 EST ------- Re: -doc subpkg naming Yeah -doc is the way to go. We're starting to find quite a few interesting interdependancies between -devel and -doc. qtdemo was one (it depended on the demos/examples from -doc, so I was moving it to -doc), then I found assistant (in -devel) tries to auto-load qt documentation on startup (and fails, obviously, if -doc/-docs isn't installed). I'm beginning to doubt the wisdom of even doing a -doc subpkg... who knows how many more interdendancies may exist. At the moment, I'm leaning toward dropping the notion of a -doc subpkg, and move it all (back) to -devel (mostly for sake of simplicity). Comments/opinions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review