Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-13 21:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > 4. Does everything build as expected under x86_64 and ppc? > I don't have either of those arch'es here, might be good to test > if someone could do some quick mockbuilds, especially since you > are directly doing some tests that would affect things on x86_64 at least. I do not use mock (because it seems to takes hours), but a standard build runs correctly on my machine, AMD Turion, with fc5. The package goes to /usr/lib64/qt4 as expected. And there is a symlink /usr/lib64/qt4/lib64 -> lib > 6. Are static (.a) libs wanted/used by anyone? > (There are 2 in -devel) libQtUiTool is used in the example at: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.1/designer-calculatorbuilder.html It is mandatory for the module QtUiTools of Qt-4: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.1/qtuitools.html libAssistantClient is for the Assistant module: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.1/qtassistant.html Maybe these two minors libs are too new in Qt, and developers didn't want to freeze them (all qt-4 versions are supposed to be binary and source compatible). > E: qt4 configure-without-libdir-spec > > Suggest: adding '--libdir=%{_libdir}' to ./configure call Qt's configure is not a GNU configure. The option --libdir does not exists. However, -libdir (one slash) exists. (Please to see this bug assigned! Hint: three requests depend on qt4, and one of them is mine...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review