[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liblrdf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313


bugs.michael@xxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx  2006-05-13 17:27 EST -------
Confirming bottom of comment 5. /usr/share/ladspa/rdf/ladspa.rdfs
is a useless example for a classification of ladspa plugins. Inside
Hydrogen it is recognised without any of the classified ladspa
plugins being available. The file should not be included in the
package. (Do we have any ladspa package in the queue which comes
with an rdf file?)

APPROVED if you fix that remaining issue.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]