Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From seg@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-13 02:44 EST ------- My preference is to only use macros if there's a solid gain to be had. As in, its something that's expected to change (versions) or it handles something ugly for you (%configure). I don't see any real gain in using macros such as %{_make}. And most of all, the spec templates do not use these macros, which implies to me they should not be used. It would be nice to have an explicit policy up on the wiki for this, even if that policy is "Use whatever, just be consistent", much like the %{buildroot} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review