Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-12 16:07 EST ------- The summary is a bit content-free, but I can't suggest a better one that fits in 80 columns. The license of this package would seem to be LGPL, according to the XMPP.pm file and the presense of LICENSE.LGPL. Fails to build due to a lack of XML::Stream. Please submit your packages in dependency order if at all possible. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. X license field matches the actual license. X license is open source-compatible; license text is included upstream but is not packaged. * source files match upstream: 6338484aa0d394e68c01666ca34e5241 Net-XMPP-1.0.tar.gz 6338484aa0d394e68c01666ca34e5241 Net-XMPP-1.0.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. Can't proceed further with the review due to dependency issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review