[Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191516


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-05-12 15:34 EST -------
Same problem here with perl(YAML) requirement in the devel repo.  Testing with
FC5 instead.

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. Text is not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   ea05b9a09ad65fbbc1864ef3b2396e64  Pod-Readme-0.081.tar.gz
   ea05b9a09ad65fbbc1864ef3b2396e64  Pod-Readme-0.081.tar.gz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (FC5, x86_64) with perl-Test-Portability-Files added.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=4, Tests=165,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.22 cusr +  0.08 csys =  0.30 CPU)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]