Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-12 13:50 EST ------- A mock build on x86_64 development failed; it seems perl-Module-Build needs perl(YAML) < 0.49, but 0.58 is in the repo. Oops. An FC5 build works. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. Licence texts are included in the package. * source files match upstream: 2ede77af4d3b82ffb39cd28fda6857e5 Test-Portability-Files-0.05.tar.gz 2ede77af4d3b82ffb39cd28fda6857e5 Test-Portability-Files-0.05.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (fc5, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=5, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.17 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.23 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review