[Bug 191509] Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-05-12 13:50 EST -------
A mock build on x86_64 development failed; it seems perl-Module-Build needs
perl(YAML) < 0.49, but 0.58 is in the repo.  Oops.  An FC5 build works.

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.  
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  Licence texts are included in the package.
* source files match upstream:
   2ede77af4d3b82ffb39cd28fda6857e5  Test-Portability-Files-0.05.tar.gz
   2ede77af4d3b82ffb39cd28fda6857e5  Test-Portability-Files-0.05.tar.gz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (fc5, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful, 2 tests skipped.
   Files=5, Tests=5,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.17 cusr +  0.06 csys =  0.23 CPU)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]