[Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bootconf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445





------- Additional Comments From mdehaan@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-05-11 10:45 EST -------
I did not look at this very closely, though I should add that grubby (command
line app) and booty (python library) already support multiple boot loaders.  If
you would like to create a GUI for booty, that sounds like a good thing,
although I am not sure if grubby needs a replacement as it already works pretty
darn well.

It makes good sense, IMHO, to support multiple boot loaders, otherwise the app
seems to collide a bit with grubconf.  Per the grubconf page, grubconf seems to
be being replaced by one of the Gnome system tools for boot configuration:

http://www.gnome.org/projects/gst/screenshots/boot.jpg

Which looks like an upgrade to what is in FC5 today. 
"Administration/bootloader" is fairly useless as it only lets you pick which
bootloader to use.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]