Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From foolish@xxxxxxxxx 2006-05-09 14:00 EST ------- Got some response from the blam developer Mikael Hallendal today: "the only reason is the same as for Blam depending on old Gtk#, I haven't had time to change this. I'd happily accept patches for this though in case you happen to be a developer. As for the best way to do it I guess it would be to change in configure.in what it is built against and start there by fixing problems arising. I'm not sure how many issues might be involved." Updating blam to use gecko-sharp2 is far beyond my abilities as I'm no developer. If anyone else wants to take a shot at it, please do go ahead. As long as gecko-sharp is required as a dependency for blam I would like to add it to Extras, despite it being superceded by gecko-sharp2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review