Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-08 12:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > So to my understanding there is nothing really preventing a release in extras, > since the gpl-text can be added to the package without it being upstream as well > for now. Or is there something I could do to actually move this topic (release > in extras) forward? Jochen is asking you to include http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt as an additional source file, to include this file as %doc in your spec, and also to try to get upstream to include a copy of the license text distributed with their source. Whilst there is no requirement in the package review guidelines for the license text to be packaged if upstream do not provide it, and poking upstream is only a *should* rather than a *must* in the guidelines, if you want to get this package approved sooner rather than later, I'd do as Jochen asks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review