Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec@xxxxxx 2006-05-08 09:34 EST ------- 1/ Epoch is currently the SVN revision Personaly I don't see why Epoch should be limited in any way. But I can study how to change the way it works currently to add a new release revision tag incremented of 1 each time the same version is released. 2/ Yes error on my side 3/ and 4/ I can't do without it !! These binaries have to be statically linked and under that path. What is the real issue here ? I can also ask the new developpers of rpmlint to amend that. 5/ - 8/ Again I need it. the rootfs directory is used to create a boot environment with mindi, so it needs all thes files and links in order to work correclty. Except if you have a better suggestion of localisation ? Concerning the duplicate messages, it's due to the fact that I use %defattr(644,root,root,755) in the spec file. It modifies the modes of the files, as set by the install.sh script. So I have to later on put them again with the right mode: %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/mindi/aux-tools/sbin/* %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/mindi/rootfs/bin/* %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/mindi/rootfs/sbin/* Any suggestion of another way to do it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review