Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-05-06 14:30 EST ------- Oops hit save too soon (before typing the comment I wanted to type) I was away this afternoon (outside, fresh air and sun you know) and while cycling to the city I was wondering about the arch problem. And I came up with a nice and clean solution which imho is much better then in the current spec file: Why not make ctapi lib packages require %{_libdir}/ctapi instead of ctapi-cmmon, then on dual arch systems like x86_64 they will automaticly drag in the right one. Since both an i386 and an x86_64 version of ctapi-common could get installed we do still need the arch in the filename under /etc/ld.so.conf.d Also in this case I think it would be better to put the README in a seperate file and "install -p" it so that both arch packages have the same timestamp for it. What do you think if you agree please attach a new version and I'll review it. If you don't agree any better suggestions? I find your current solution not so elegant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review