[Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sblim


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845


jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|notting@xxxxxxxxxx          |jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx
OtherBugsDependingO|188265                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-05-05 14:20 EST -------
Needing to be in RHEL5 does not mean it needs to be in FC-6.  There is no more
rule that it has to be in Core to be in RHEL.  Period.  Extras is perfectly
suitable for a management suite, and Extras software can be used within RHEL.

Punting this to an extras review, but still doing the review.

Well, I can't do the review, 404 on the spec file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]