[Bug 190308] Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190308


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-05-01 14:50 EST -------
Sorry this took so long; I was in the middle of the review when I had an
emergency at the office.

I don't think this is a blocker; it's proably a mock artifact, but I don't quite
understand the issue:

t/14_charsets....................ok
        11/11 skipped: Bizare Unicode-incompatible locale detected

The code that checks this is:

	# In some (weird) cases with custom locales, things aren't words
	# that should be
	unless ( "ä" =~ /\w/ ) {
		skip( "Bizare Unicode-incompatible locale detected", 11 );
	}

This check fails in mock on x86_64 and i386, FC5 and development.

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
follows the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible; text is included in the package.
* source files match upstream:
   a629d953e0002813061c4308c64993f6  PPI-1.112.tar.gz
   a629d953e0002813061c4308c64993f6  PPI-1.112.tar.gz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
O Extra BuildRequires: satisfiable in the default build environment; not a blocker.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
O %check is present and all tests pass, but some tests were skipped:
   All tests successful, 11 subtests skipped.
   Files=31, Tests=5844, 17 wallclock secs (15.13 cusr +  0.80 csys = 15.93 CPU)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED, but please do investigate the failing test.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]