[Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482





------- Additional Comments From ed@xxxxxxx  2006-05-01 11:16 EST -------
Hi Neal, this isn't a full review, just a few quick observations:

 - Is this your first package?  If so, we'll add FE-NEEDSPONSOR per:
     http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors
 - incorrect BuildRoot:
     http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
 - please either make Source0 a full URL or indicate (with some 
     comments in the spec file) how one can generate the tar-ball 
     from, for instance, the upstream CVS [this is so we can more 
     easily verify that source matches upstream] 
 - please remove Prefix and Vendor
 - please add a changelog
 - please consider changing %defattr(-,root,root) to 
     %defattr(-,root,root,-)

You might want to take a look at the review guidelines:

  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

and build your rpm in mock ("yum install mock") and run your generated 
RPM through rpmlint ("yum install rpmlint") to see if you might find any 
other items -- it could make the job easier easier for reviewers!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]