Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-05-01 06:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > The lib for the CT-API dos not put in the ld cache, because all apps the use > CT-API call must use the lib via dl_open(). Hmm, is this written / documented somewhere? Since there are multiple possible providers for the ctapi (libopenctapi.so , libtowitoko.so, libctapi-cyberjack.so) this doesn't sound completly unlogical, but I wonder if its documented somewhere. Also how is a user supposed to find out what ctapi providers there are with all these non consistent names? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review