Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list@xxxxxxxxxx |review@xxxxxxxxxx jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx 2006-04-30 22:09 EST ------- rpmlint checks return: E: kchmviewer old-menu-entry /usr/share/applnk/kchmviewer.desktop Not necessary with it already in /usr/share/applications - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file ok %description's a bit long, but oh well. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review