[Bug 189824] Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189824


gemi@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |gemi@xxxxxxxxxx
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-04-30 19:54 EST -------
First the good news: no complaints from rpmlint.
Now for the nitpicks:-)
1. The doc directory properly belong in the -devel package, since
   it is API documentation.
2. In %description I would use LASi instead of libLASi since that
   is the name.
3. The -devel package needs Requires: pango-devel and freetype-devel
   These are included in LASi.h

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]