Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-04-30 16:57 EST ------- Sorry, no more time (today) for a full review. I did build it and ran it through rpmlint: W: ctapi-cyberjack strange-permission ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8.tar.bz2 0744 W: ctapi-cyberjack strange-permission ctapi-cyberjack.spec 0600 You should fix these, easy. E: ctapi-cyberjack library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so.0 Hmm, bad error! Probably something wrong with the link command I can look into this one for you if you want, just let me know. W: ctapi-cyberjack devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so That should be fixed, easy. E: ctapi-cyberjack library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so.0 E: ctapi-cyberjack library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so.0 2 more which you should fix. W: ctapi-cyberjack-devel no-documentation No problem E: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc library-not-linked-against-libc /libcyberjack_ifd.so Again probably the strange ld invocation, let me know if you need help W: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/reader.conf.d/cyberjack.conf Amke tbis %config(noreplace) W: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc no-documentation No problem E: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/reader.conf.d/cyberjack.conf E: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc script-without-shellbang /etc/reader.conf.d/cyberjack.conf The second one is becayse of the first one, change the mode of this to 644. I think a new version fixing this before the fullreview is a good idea, don't hesitate if you need help with the not linked to libc errors, that should be easy to fix for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review