Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-25 21:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > My feeling is that, while what Akira is suggesting has merit, what it's > ultimately an attempt to do is to bend rpm to deal with installation from source > (.el) rather than binary.. it's not so dissimilar to gentoos ebuilds etc. It > really seems like trying to get rpm to do things it wasn't designed to do. I'm > in favour of keeping things simple, working with binary packages, and not aiming > for the canonical solution. it's sensible. discussing something without the real implementation is little messy. so I'll try to do it when I have a time, and let's continue to discuss against it then. Sorry to interrupt your package contribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.