Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-04-25 15:48 EST ------- That was quick, before I start doing a full review, one very important question remains: As I've understood you've written pybackpack yourself for google's summer of code last summer and then sorta went under the radar, assuming I've understood this correctly, what are the chances of you dropping under the radar again in the future? I think its great you want to create and maintain an FE package of your software, but "we" expect a certain amound of responsivenes / reachability from contributers. We don't want users and other contributers to get frustrated by a (total) lack of response / communication. We're all volunteers so I'm not asking for 24 hour max respnse time, and a response could be: "sorry real busy with real life right now I'll look at this next month, if you hear nothing within 6 weeks poke me" Please don't take this the wrong way, but before I sponsor someone especially my first someone, I would like some assurance (a promise will do) that you won't "disappear" (again). OTOH I might have misunderstood the history surrounding this, again in that case please don't take this wrong :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.