Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-25 10:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > think is blocking is the errant provide of sdl_driver.so, although I'd like to > know what's up with the debuginfo RPM. > > rpmlint says: > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_util.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_audio.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_wrapper.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_glext.h > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_glu.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_gen.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_glext.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl.h > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_driver.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_spec.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_video.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_events.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_gl.c > > I have no idea what it's on about here, or why RPM would choose to put copies of > development files into the debuginfo RPM. I'm not inclined to hold up inclusion > of this package because of this, These can be fixed by removing the exec bit from the listed files using chmod in %prep. There's no reason for .c or .h files to be executable... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.