Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 petersen@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-21 21:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I would like to leave it as it is. Better too many requirements than > not enough. Maybe there is a bug somewhere but building in mock > without requiring xorg-x11-proto-devel did not succeed. > Also, the build may seem to succeed, and the packages installed, but > the binary modules may not be there! I had quite a fun time to > figure out the requirements. Hmm ok, it seemed to build fine for me in mock without them, though I didn't do an careful rpmdiff comparison... I guess some the early modular X packages had some missing -devel deps, but I think that is all sorted out now. Otherwise please report the problem in bugzilla. > > Also better to keep openal-devel around for when HOpenal gets updated > > (ghc-6.4.2 includes a newer version apparently). And it builds on fc4 > > anyway. > The problem is, as it seems, that the openal package is then included > but the binary module is not. I will include a commented out > buildreq. Ah, good point. I suppose one could patch to the latest version released with ghc-6.4.2. Anyway it may be an idea to subpackage openal too for FC4 say: so perhaps a %_with_openal switch would be useful. (In reply to comment #9) > > Btw what is "touch src/stamp-h.in" needed for? > It appears that this is necessary so that configure creates > all the necessary files. Without it, the prefix is set to > "/usr/local" for example. Oh, sounds like a bug then. In my Fedora Haskell package I didn't do that, but hadn't noticed any problems, I wasn't using %configure - dunno if that is related. > I have made some little changes, same file, same place. Thanks for your submission and all your work on this. The package is ACCEPTED. Please build it for FE4 too. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.