[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452





------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-04-21 12:45 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Is 1.13-2 acceptable in its current form, or should I not remove the execute bits?

You could leave the exec bits on. The extra dependencies you get as a result of
this are:

 * /usr/bin/perl
 * perl(Curses)
 * perl(ExtUtils::testlib)

perl(Curses) is provided by the package itself, and the other two are provided
by the main perl package, which is already a dependency of this package. So
there aren't any new dependencies introduced by leaving the exec bits on.

It might also be worth adding a comment in the spec file that the
worrying-looking output from the build script...:

Making a guess for "c-config.h"...
WARNING: Your Curses form.h file appears to be in the default
system search path, which will not work for us because of
the conflicting Perl form.h file.  This means your 'make' will
probably fail unless you fix this, as described in the INSTALL
file.

... can be ignored because /usr/include/form.h is a symlink to
/usr/include/ncurses/form.h, which the Makefile.PL finds and uses quite happily.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]