Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list@xxxxxxxxxx |review@xxxxxxxxxx petersen@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |coldwell@xxxxxxxxxx, | |petersen@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-18 05:32 EST ------- Perhaps the naming could/should be: emacs-muse, emacs-muse-common, emacs-muse-xemacs, etc? Well we need some kind of Fedora policy on how to package elisp IMHO. Some time ago tagoh suggested to me the idea of doing it the Debian way, ie bytecompiling at install time for the installed emacsen. Assuming emacs 22 doesn't get released soon, we may well see a emacs22 package in Extras soon too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.