[Bug 189046] Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-04-15 12:51 EST -------
Some warnings running the tests; nothing serious but it should probably be
reported upstream:
t/03_functions....Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at
t/03_functions.t line 54.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73.
ok
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=97,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.21 cusr +  0.06 csys =  0.27 CPU)

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
conforms to the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   0c60795da495f6a79d09362e8b4f0061  Log-Message-Simple-0.01.tar.gz
   0c60795da495f6a79d09362e8b4f0061  Log-Message-Simple-0.01.tar.gz-srpm
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directory it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]