Re: NON-sequencer release

[Brian Monroe <briancmonroe@xxxxxxxxx>]

Without looking, I'm not sure but it could be the dependency has a non-free license, or non's license changed. I'll try to look later, or maybe someone else can chime in.

On Wed Nov 12 2014 at 1:37:05 AM The name of my band is 1984 <thenameofmybandis1984@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

hi,

i've been back playing with the NON-* suite in the last days. i've realized that the non-sequencer is 1.2.0 . according to the author, 1.9.2 should be used as stable. is there any particular reason why 1.2.0 is still pakaged? i've compiled successfully the 1.9.2, but i had to search the internet for missing ntk dependencies...

http://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=11107

http://libremusicproduction.com/articles/friday-interview-4-jonathan-liles

cheers

max

_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music

_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music