Re: Jack and pulse on the Spin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/31/2012 07:10 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 05/31/2012 03:25 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 31/05/12 08:43, Brendan Jones wrote:
Just a note that the default F17 pulseaudio configuration supports
jack bridging via dbus (/etc/pulse/default.pa).

### Automatically connect sink and source if JACK server is
present .ifexists module-jackdbus-detect.so .nofail load-module
module-jackdbus-detect .fail .endif

This is different to again to
module-jack-sink.so/module-jack-source.so which is what some of us
have been using up until now.

What that means is if jack-audio-connection-kit-dbus is on the spin
by default, bridging is set up automatically.

This is something that needs to be considered carefully and I'd be
interested in how well jackdbus is working for people. I was
having random errors in the past with jackdbus hogging CPU with
pulse. I will perform some more monitoring here, but it would be
great to hear what others have experienced.

Throwing in a large torch at fire here now ... do we really need
pulseaudio? I mean, this is a multi-media production spin, filled
with applications where Jack has become the standard - at least among
the audio based applications.

I don't know how that jack/pulse bridge really works ... but if pulse
really is needed, wouldn't it be better to write something which can
completely replace the pulse libraries, and rather re-use just the API
... so that pulse based applications appears as those in/out sinks in
Jack directly? This might be a rather long-term goal though.

With pulseaudio-jack bridging, both are running. Pulseaudio simply
redirects its output to jack's default system input ports.

This means applications which are not jack enabled will in most cases
simply work. I regularly need to run applications for work (such as
skype) and this seems to be a really stable solution.

Having said that, I'd really like one of the aims of the Spin be
focussed on ease of configuration, and providing an easy way to disable
pulseaudio completely should be considered.

I think pulseaudio is here to stay and if there is still stuff that does not work correctly it should be fixed (as opposed to gutting the whole thing).

I would be opposed to having the pulse to jack bridge automatically kick in.

This should be certainly an option and would be very useful, but there should be an easy to use configuration setup where I can choose whether pulse automatically goes to jack or not (and for the Fedora Jam spin it should be off by default, I think). In the usage cases I manage you do not want that to be "on" by default. If you are in the middle of a mixing session or in a concert performance you do not want a random application that you forgot to turn off suddenly decide it is a good idea to warn the user about something with a nice chime sound...

-- Fernando


This might be a better way to get better predictability in how the
audio production applications would behave, still having a fallback
for non-jack capable software.

Please educate me if I'm totally wrong here.


kind regards,

David Sommerseth
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/HcUcACgkQIIWEatLf4HeKFQCfeZY63NLf82/4ePLXKQBLUdky
V+gAn2lrXHIsPPjVmCo/NfCYS0VA0FIu
=fLRW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Users]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux