Re: Call to arms - Fedora Audio Spin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/19/2012 03:48 PM, Manuel Ospina wrote:
> Hello Brendan,
> 
> I'd like to help. I went through the list of to do and I think I
> can help with "packaging the Fedora Musician's guide". is it
> written using publican? I would need some guidance though.

Manuel:

Yes, Chris worked with Fedora Docs to use Publican and adopted other
processes that should make it easier to package. However, it might be
packaged already? I thought that was how Publican deployed to the webUI:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/Musicians_Guide/index.html

Regardless, I'm sure Chris will welcome your expert help. :)

- - Karsten

> Regards, Manuel
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brendan Jones" 
> <brendan.jones.it@xxxxxxxxx> To: music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 1:24:59 AM Subject:
>  Call to arms - Fedora Audio Spin
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Traditionally Fedora has been known to walk the bleeding edge in
> free and open source software development but for some reason this
> has never been realised in the realms of pro-audio/music creation.
> 
> Fedora has never really attracted the support of the audio 
> development community, and as a direct result has only flagging 
> support from audio users, enthusiasts and professionals alike.
> 
> I think there are a number of reasons for this: 1) Strict
> packaging and licensing guidelines, 2) relatively short release
> support cycles 3) the absence of an stock RT kernel 4) the effort
> required to tailor an installation for audio use
> 
> Distributions like Debian/Ubuntu/Arch (and others like AVLinux)
> have garnered strong support because they in some way address all
> of these issues. Fedora however...
> 
> 1) and 2) we can't change. In fact at the end of the day these 
> strengthen the distribution by making the packages we ship more 
> robust and closer to upstream. It also demands a certain amount of 
> love to ensure that updates/ABI bumps/breakages are dealt with 
> decisively and swiftly. It also means that audio developers are
> more unlikely to maintain their own packages in Fedora (we need
> more maintainers)
> 
> 3) I can't see happening any time soon. The kernel team maintain
> so many out of tree patches already that I don't think they really
> have the time nor desire to maintain the realtime kernel as well. I
> don't see this as a problem - recent kernels have incorporated much
> of the the rt kernel patches of old and should satisfy most users.
> For those with more stringent requirements can rely on the CCRMA
> patched kernels
> 
> 4) is where I think an audio spin comes into play. If we can 
> collate/automate all of the steps involved in setting up Fedora for
>  audio production we will attract both users and maintainers alike
>  alleviating the problems caused by 1 and 2.
> 
> I'm proposing to formally revive the past Fedora Audio Spin / Music
>  Creation efforts of a couple of years ago in time for an F18
> Audio spin release. This means we have one whole release cycle to
> get all of the packages we require into stable so they can be
> available for Live composes for the F18 release cycle.
> 
> Apart from packaging efforts, the last few weeks for me has been an
>  information gathering exercise. More on this soon, but briefly,
> the current to do list is: - pulling in all of the must have
> packages from CCRMA - determining the package list - packaging the
> Fedora Musician's guide - repackaging/patching rpmfusion packages
> for Fedora (qtractor and others if required) - developing sane RT
> priorities for the stock kernels (threadirqs) - consensus on
> distribution media, default desktop/supported desktops - default
> systemd enabled services - themes and artwork - resubmit the Spin
> proposal for F18
> 
> If you want to contribute, here's how: - become a contributor/get
> a FAS account [1] and join the music-creation group - help maintain
> the audio creation wiki's  (formalize the to do list)[2][3] - this
> is really out of date. Many packages have been orphaned or are
> already in Fedora. Needs to be brought in line with the package
> database [5]. I'm not convinced that this page really needs to be
> so detailed. Wish lsit is probably the most important - register
> your interest in the contributor section of the audio spin wiki [3]
> - help test new packages - I will be listing all upcoming changes
> on this list and I encourage other package maintainers to do the
> same [3] - become a tester or packager of audio packages [4][5] -
> help test the new spins as we make them available. - join Chris in
> his documentation efforts [7] - volunteer desktop artwork - and
> most importantly, voice your opinion on how this project should be
> realized! Choice of media/desktop/applications /configuration etc.
> More proposals on this coming soon.
> 
> Packaging the software and building the media constitutes less than
> a quarter of the effort required here. What we need most is strong
>  community support so please respond to this email if you are 
> interested!
> 
> Lets do it
> 
> Brendan
> 
> [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ [2] 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Audio_Creation [3] 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AudioCreationSpinDevelopment [4] 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA [5] 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
>
>
> 
[6] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
> [7] 
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Musicians_Guide/index.html
>
>
> 
_______________________________________________
> music mailing list music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music 
> _______________________________________________ music mailing list
>  music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music


- -- 
name:  Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect
team:    Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership
uri:              http://communityleadershipteam.org
                         http://TheOpenSourceWay.org
gpg:                                        AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFPQorw2ZIOBq0ODEERAlWeAJ4wNvx2cJiEL90M5BYPp5hz++golACbBhRB
V6GPeVf3zDcVchnx8eCxPLc=
=2e+O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Users]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux