On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 17:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 02:39 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Is this happening with the standard Fedora kernel or the rt kernel? > >> >> > >> > > >> > This is Fedora kernel > >> > 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64 > >> > I'll see what happens with the rt kernel. > >> > > >> > >> I tried all 2x2=4 combinations of latest Fedora 11 kernel, latest rt > >> kernel and jack, jack2. Same result :( > >> Where shall I report this? > > > > Probably upstream? I don't know if there's a mailing list. It does look > > like a bug to me... it is strange that it happens only the first time. > > > > I reported it upstream: > http://fluidsynth.resonance.org/trac/ticket/51 > > Then I located the problem yesterday. When I compile fluidsynth with > portaudio support, I get the xruns even if I don't use the portaudio > driver. Very weird indeed. > > I checked both fluidsynth and qsynth code and I don't see how the > portaudio part ofthe code might affect jackd. Well, I modified the > fluidsynth package in Fedora and removed the portaudio support. I > don't think that this will make many users sad. Anyhow, I will see if > I can find a true solution. Wow, that _is_ strange. Anyway, no tears here, portaudio should IMHO just die quietly (anything built using portaudio for audio support will make for a very bad jack client - one sad example is audacity, I think portaudio has no concept of audio interfaces that can be "dynamic"). -- Fernando _______________________________________________ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
