> On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 16:24 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > >> I will start writing the wiki page this week and report the status >> once I have enough material that can benefit from feedback. > I did start writing the wiki page [1] last week but I got stuck at one point. It is not easy to make a good and fair classification. If we just take the AudioCreation software away and make a new group with them, and leave all the Audio/Video players, Digital Media and Video production software in Multimedia, it will be bad design. We need a better solution, which is not that easy to find. These are the types of software we have in the Multimedia group. - Audio Player - Video Player - Both Audio and Video Player - Digital (optical) Media Creation - Digital (optical) Media Ripping - Video Creation - Subtitle software - Audio Creation (which itself has many sub-categories) So how shall we do the branching? * A starting point would be separating Audio and Video. Then make "Players" and "Creation" subgroups an each. But then where will the CD/DVD creation/ripping stuff will go? * Another starting point would be to separate Creation stuff altogether, leaving all the players in Multimedia. Then the Creation group will contain both Audio and Video stuff. This is not a bad thing to do if the subgrouping is made logical. * Yet another starting point is, do not create another main group. Just do all the subgrouping inside Multimedia. I really can't decide which of the three to pick. Can I get some opinions here? In all the cases, we will have the issue of having some packages that belong to multiple subgroups. How shall we handle this? Orcan PS: I'm also CC'ing planetccrma list in case some users want to share their opinions. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraStudio _______________________________________________ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
