On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 17:22 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > Had a good chat with Adrian Likins, Steven Salevan and Luke Macken today > about what a "music collaboration server" might look like. Here's a whole > firehose full of notes. To Adrian/Steven/Luke, this'll probably mean more > -- but any questions, feel free to ask. :) I'm not exactly sure what you're up to, but... The fundamental problem with real collaboration in the area is that you're limited to working with the lowest common denomination of tools. I, for instance, have Sonar and Reason, plus a number of plugins. The kind of collaboration I'm able to do is extremely limited unless the people I'm collaborating with have exactly the same set of tools and plugins. People who are willing to spend money on commercial tools are also more likely to spend money on commercial collaboration services. In the FOSS world, however, access to tools is a non-issue. We should just be able to yum/apt-get them. I think a "music collaboration server" for FOSS-based music production makes perfect sense, but I didn't see you mention Rosegarden/Ardour/Hydrogen. Perhaps LASH could be extended to work using a client server model. Now that would be pretty spiffy... AG _______________________________________________ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
