Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE

[Aaron Sherman <ajs@xxxxxxx>]

Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Anthony Green (green@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
>   
> > There are some discussions about merging parts of PlanetCCRMA into
> > Fedora Extras.  One of the problems has to do with package namespace
> > conflicts.  For instance, PlanetCCRMA has had a "muse" package for many
> > years (http://www.muse-sequencer.org).  But now FE has an emacs
> > extension package called "muse". 
> >     
> > One of the suggestions was to use the official project spelling of
> > "MusE" for the package name.  Do the Extras packaging guidelines allow
> > this (having both MusE and muse package)?
> > Some combination of CVS, bugzilla, and/or the buildsystem I suspect would
> > break.
> >
> > Frankly, I'd rename the emacs thing emacs-muse, but that's just me. :)
> >     
Why not call the CCRMA packages "<package>-CCRMA"? That way there's no 
conflicts. If this is just a spec file change, it won't affect CVS, and 
it's a relatively trivial build change. As for Bugzilla... well, I don't 
know what kind of automatic hooks the software has into submitting bug 
reports, but it should not be hard to strip the trailing -CCRMA for 
submitting.

However, in this one case, I agree with the idea that if muse is an 
emacs add-on, it should probably be emacs-muse.