On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 16:55 -0700, Anthony Green wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 16:38 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > Hey great!! Too bad you did not sync with me, I've been working this two > > last weeks on pretty much the same stuff. But there are things that I > > don't have which is great! What has delayed me this past week is work on > > the menu system (I'm pretty much done and I was going to release a bunch > > of packages later today). > > I'll see if there's anything I should take from your spec files. And viceversa, I see you did a bunch of improvements in the ardour spec file! BTW, you may know something about this... I'm working on what used to be the Planet CCRMA menu. I had this on fc3, then could not make it work as is in fc4 but it is time I readded it, and I just did that for fc5 (and will percolate to fc4). It basically an (optional) submenu of the Audio/Video applications submenu where the apps are categorized. But the question is about the Fedora Audio/Video menu. Currently there is no "More Audio/Video Applications" entry in the applications menu xml file, but there is a "Multimedia-More.directory" directory file. So I'm adding a merged "More..." submenu in my optional planetccrma-menus package so that I can push "not so important apps" from the main Audio/Video menu - otherwise it becomes really really long with the full set of Planet CCRMA applications (if the optional planetccrma-menus is not installed they will just not appear in the menu system). What would be the category for those? I seem to remember something like this used to be: <Category>AudioVideo-Extra</Category>. Would this be fine? (I'm doing that for now) > [MUNCH] > > I would drop qjackconnect in favor of qjackctl, the later is the > > canonical jack server control app (and also sports a midi patchbay). > > Yes, I'm not planning on submitting qjackconnect to Extras either. My > recent post to fedora-music-list lists the packages I've submitted so > far. Oh, I had not seen it. Sigh, I'm soooo behind on so many fronts :-) > > I added a patch for lash so that it does not need an entry > > in /etc/services for the lash service (it will use the default instead). > > You will be able to pick this later today from the srpm. > > I'll grab that. > > > DSSI is now up > > to 0.9.1 and fluidsynth-dssi is a separate package (finally!). > > Ok, thanks for pointing that out. > > > Are you > > planning on packaging the Hydrogen kits separately? I used to have a > > separate package but I merged them into the main package a while back... > > the example drumkits and demo songs are very useful for demos, with them > > (or at least some of them) it is easy to just fire up hydrogen and get > > sound out of it. > > I didn't know there was a PlanetCCRMA hydrogen package, so I wrote this > one from scratch. I bundled everything in the hydrogen package (kits & > demos), for the same reason. Hmmm, maybe I'm looking at the wrong spec file, it looks like your hydrogen package does not have any drumkits in it? > > Another question... have you tried caps with ardour? I'm having problems > > with that combination, selinux complains about something and the caps > > collection does not get loaded at all. > > I'm one of those bad hackers who disables selinux. I'll enable and see > what happens. Let me know what happens and if you find a workaround. I imagine some sort of magic chcon has to be done on the libraries at build time... > > What should be packaged today, at least till that patch makes it into > > cvs (that was going to happen a couple of days ago) is the clock_fix > > branch of Jack cvs. Otherwise Jack will have problems in Athlon X2 > > machines... > > You should mention this here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 I will, thanks for pointing this out to me. -- Fernando
