Talking points and the future of talking points

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For F30, I've added some talking points to the wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_talking_points

If no one beats me to it, I'll try to start contacting working groups
on Monday to get more content.

For F31 and beyond, I want to start a conversation about how we want
to produce this (or if we want to continue doing it). Do we know
how/if people are actually using the talking points document? My
observation is that Eduard and others spend a lot of time and effort
trying to drag content out of the working groups and it's not clear
that we get much value from that effort.

On a related note, the design team produces a digital ad that is
displayed in Red Hat offices for Fedora releases[1]. Mo asked how we
should get the content to them and I answered[2] that it should be
part of the talking points process; we should open a ticket with the
design team to provide the wording as we product the talking points.
Any disagreement or other comments?

[1] https://pagure.io/design/issue/621
[2] https://pagure.io/fedora-marketing/issue/288#comment-565425

-- 
Ben Cotton
Fedora Program Manager
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Pronouns: he/him
_______________________________________________
Fedora Marketing mailing list -- marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to marketing-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux